Resources

After a failed PDR: the Plan of Remediation

Deficiencies on your Provider Discovery Review aren't the end — ignoring the paper trail that follows can be. Here's the sequence: the PDR report, the 30-day reconsideration window, the Plan of Remediation, and the deadlines with teeth.

Updated July 2026

Your Provider Discovery Review ends with a report, not a verdict. Qlarant mails the PDR report within 45 days of completing the review, scoring each standard Met or Not Met — health-and-safety standards weigh 3 points, person-centered and billing standards 2, the rest 1, and each alert type subtracts 5 points (up to 15). What you do in the weeks after that envelope arrives determines whether findings become a fixed process or a provider-agreement problem.

Step one: the 30-day reconsideration clock

If the report cites potential billing discrepancies you believe are wrong, you have exactly one shot: a written reconsideration request that Qlarant must receive within 30 days of the report's mailing date. One request per PDR, every supporting document submitted at once — and documentation you didn't make available during the original review is not accepted. That last rule is the quiet killer: reconsideration can't fix what your files didn't contain on review day. Reconsideration applies only to billing-discrepancy standards; other findings go straight to remediation.

Step two: the Plan of Remediation

For cited deficiencies, APD requests a Plan of Remediation (POR) — the Handbook's term for your written corrective plan, agreed with APD and submitted to your Regional APD office (not Qlarant). Two things about it are widely misunderstood. First, there is no universal deadline: your correction timeframe is specified in the findings documentation itself, so the dates in your report are the law of your case. Second, the stakes are contractual — the Medicaid Waiver Services Agreement provides that failing to correct noted deficiencies within the stated timeframes may result in termination of the agreement. A POR is not paperwork to file and forget; it's commitments with dates.

A workable POR names each finding, the root cause, the fix, the person responsible, the completion date, and — the part reviewers look for next year — how you'll keep it fixed. If the finding was a missing training or an expired document, “we uploaded it” is remediation; “our system now tracks every expiration and warns us at 30/60/90 days” is prevention.

The strongest remediation evidence is structural: show APD the deficiency can't silently recur. That's precisely what APDHQ's file checklists, expiration tracking, and audit-readiness dashboard exist to prove.

Don't start from Not-Met-everywhere

The worst PDR outcomes are usually process failures, not care failures. Per Qlarant's operational manual: if you don't respond to two scheduling attempts, APD gives you 3 business days — then you're scored Not Met in every area. Records not made available in the designated timeframe score Not Met across the record review. No-show a scheduled review and after 30 minutes the same happens. And on a desk review, you get 7 calendar days and one electronic submission — nothing added afterward is accepted. Answer the phone, hit the windows, and your remediation will be about findings, not forfeits.

Frequently asked questions

What is a Plan of Remediation (POR)?

The iBudget Handbook defines it as a plan of proposed corrective actions developed by the provider and agreed to by APD, addressing services cited as below standard or non-compliant. It's the formal follow-up to deficiencies found in monitoring — including your Qlarant PDR. You submit it to your Regional APD office, not to Qlarant.

How long do I have to correct deficiencies?

There is no universal statewide deadline — the timeframe is specified in the findings report itself, and the Medicaid Waiver Services Agreement requires correcting noted deficiencies within that stated period. The same agreement says failure to correct within the stated timeframes may result in termination. Read your report's dates first, then build the plan around them.

Can I dispute PDR findings?

Partially. Qlarant's reconsideration process applies only to standards related to noted potential billing discrepancies — and the request must be in writing and received within 30 days of the PDR report's mailing date. One request per PDR, all documents at once, and documentation that wasn't made available during the original review will not be accepted. Qlarant issues its reconsideration report within 30 days of receipt.

What happens if I ignore the process?

The scoring already answers this: dodge scheduling twice and, after a 3-business-day APD follow-up window, you're scored Not Met in ALL areas; fail to produce records in the designated timeframe and every record-review standard scores Not Met; no-show a scheduled review and after 30 minutes the same happens. A Not-Met-everywhere PDR then feeds the remediation process from the worst possible starting point.

Is a Plan of Remediation the same as a Corrective Action Plan?

Functionally yes — Rule 65G-14, F.A.C. (which governs Qualified Organizations/WSCs) states a Corrective Action Plan 'has the same meaning as a Plan of Remediation.' For iBudget service providers, the Handbook and Qlarant materials use 'Plan of Remediation.' Either way: written plan, agreed with APD, with deadlines that bind you.

The paperwork ends here.

Book a 15-minute walkthrough and see how agencies run consumers, staff, notes, and signatures from one system.